7 Peec AI alternatives for agencies

Last updated October 2, 2026 · by Swayam Garg, co-founder, Moistur AI

Peec AI has the clearest agency tiers in the category: Essential at US$245 a month for 3 client projects, Growth at US$495 for 10 and Scale at US$795 for 25, with white-label reporting listed on its agency pricing page. Agencies still search for an alternative, and usually for one of three reasons: the prompt pool on Growth is about 277 prompts across ten clients, under 28 each; Claude and the other add-on models cost extra on top of the six core assistants; and Peec's three public pages disagree about which tier includes Looker Studio, the API and MCP. This page ranks seven alternatives on one question, what ten white-label client reports cost a month, with every price read from the vendor's own page on the date shown.

The short answer

The short answer

If you run five to fifty client retainers and need client-facing reports under your own brand, the alternatives that publish a ten-client price cluster between US$489 and US$499 a month: Otterly AI (US$489 plus Agency Partner status, with branded reports built in Google Looker Studio), Moistur AI (US$499 flat for up to 10 client brands with white-label PDFs, client logins and Claude included) and Semrush (US$499 once you add a white-label report per client). Nightwatch is lower still in euros if AI visibility is one column on an SEO report rather than the service you sell.

If what you want from Peec AI is exactly what it is good at, meaning daily tracking, pitch projects to audit prospects before they sign, prompts in any language across 80+ countries and a 1–5 relative prompt-volume score on each tracked question, none of the seven is a straight swap, and the section "Who should stay with Peec AI" says so. Profound and Goodie sell per-client workspaces at a much higher total; Scrunch puts multi-client work on a custom Enterprise quote.

Three shortcuts: the at-a-glance table below, the best AI visibility tools roundup ranked on the same benchmark, and a free check of your own AI visibility before you evaluate anything.

At a glance

Peec AI alternatives at a glance

Prices are monthly list prices for ten client brands with client-facing output under your brand, on the billing basis each vendor displays. "Not described" means the pricing page does not mention white-label output at all; "not published" means there is no ten-client price to compare. Each row carries the date its page was read.

#ToolBest forTen clients, per month (billing stated)White-label reportsClient brands includedAssistants trackedChecked on
1NightwatchSEO agencies that want AI visibility as a column on the rankings report they already send€159 a month billed yearly (€1,908 a year), or €199 billed monthlyYes: client-facing reports under your own brand, included from the Professional plan up25 websites and 150 AI prompts on ProfessionalChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews2026-10-02
2Otterly AISmall agencies starting with one or two clients who can live with a Looker Studio report as the white-label layerUS$489 a month (Premium, 400 prompts) plus Agency Partner status, applied for after subscribing; annual billing 15% offPartial: branded reports built in Google Looker Studio; no native PDF or share page describeda separate workspace per client for Agency Partners; 500 prompts on PremiumChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan; Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as paid add-ons2026-10-02
3Moistur AIAgencies running 5 to 50 client brands that want white-label PDFs, client logins, six assistants and statistically honest scores on one flat planUS$499 a month flat (Agency), billed monthly; 20% less billed annuallyYes: Your logo, colours and company details on playbook PDFs, report share links and scheduled emails, with the attribution line removable; client logins show the client's read-only dashboard on moistur.aiUp to 10 client brands, 125 prompts a day pooledChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot; Grok and Google AI Mode on Enterprise2026-09-23
4SemrushAgencies already running on Semrush that want AI mentions in the dashboards they knowUS$499 a month: Pro+ at US$299 plus a white-label Pro report at US$20 per client, each per report, billed monthlyPartial: A white-label Pro report from My Reports at US$20 per report, billed monthly; the Agency Growth Kit's client portal is discontinued15 websites and 100 prompts tracked daily on Pro+Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini; Claude, DeepSeek and Grok via Enterprise AIO2026-10-02
5ProfoundEnterprise brands, and the agencies that serve them, with a dedicated AEO team and a budget line of its ownAbout US$4,089 a month at list: US$99 a month plus US$399 a month per client workspace, from the self-serve Agency Growth plan referenced in its pricing FAQNot described: White-label output is not mentioned on the pricing page100 prompts per full client workspace; 10 pitch workspaces a monthChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews per client workspace; up to 9 engines on Enterprise2026-10-02
6Goodie AIAgencies running a full AEO programme per client, priced per workspace, with strategist supportUS$4,265 a month at the annual-billing rates Goodie displays: Agency Growth at US$275 plus a client workspace at US$399 per client, billed quarterly or annuallyNot described: White-label output is not mentioned on the pricing page; MCP, API and data export are listed for custom client reporting on Enterprisefull client workspaces as an add-on; 10 pitch workspaces a month on Agency Growth5 core models on Core and 8 on Pro per the brand plans; up to 13 engines on agency Enterprise2026-10-02
7Scrunch AIAgencies on a Sitecore contract that want AI visibility next to content and agent-experience workNot published for ten clients: Core is US$250 a month for 1 brand workspace; multi-client work is Enterprise, priced on requestPartial: white-label outputs through its API, on Enterprisea custom number of brand workspaces on Enterprise; Core has 1ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot on Core; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Copilot and Grok on Enterprise2026-10-02
Why

Why agencies look for a Peec AI alternative

The prompt pool is small once you divide it. On 2026-10-02 Peec's agency pricing page listed Growth at US$495 a month for 10 client projects with 25,000 credits, which its plan table puts at about 277 tracked prompts; across ten clients that is under 28 prompts each. Scale, at US$795 for 25 client projects, pools about 722. For an agency whose clients each have forty or fifty buyer questions worth tracking, the number to check is prompts per client, not the tier name.

Claude costs extra. Peec's brand plans include 3 engines chosen from six core assistants, and Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen and Mistral are paid add-on models unlocked on higher tiers. An agency that promised a client Claude coverage pays for it on top of the tier, or buys a higher tier to unlock it.

The three public pages disagree. Peec's for-agencies page says every tier includes Looker Studio, the API and MCP; its AI-instructions page says Looker Studio from Growth up and the API and MCP on Comprehensive only; its agency pricing grid lists the Looker Studio connector on Scale and Comprehensive and the API, MCP and CSV exports on every agency tier. Each was read on 2026-10-02. Until they agree, an agency quoting a client has to confirm the tier in writing.

The score is a daily reading. Peec reports visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice tracked daily, with a 1–5 relative prompt-volume score per prompt and visibility-lift analysis. What its pages do not describe is a confidence interval on the score, or a loop that re-measures a recommended action after you ship it. Agencies that have had to explain a number that moved for no reason tend to ask for both.

Method

How we evaluated

One axis, stated up front: the monthly list price to report on ten client brands with client-facing output under the agency's brand. It is arithmetic on public prices, so every vendor on this page can verify it, and it is the literal constraint in the question agencies ask us most often.

Three rules. List prices only, on the billing basis the vendor displays; where only an annual-billing rate is shown, the entry says so and derives the monthly-billed figure when the page gives enough to do it. Vendors with no ten-client price rank last in a "not published" group ordered by entry price. Every figure carries the date its page was read, and the same quotes are re-checked by a weekly script that flags any that disappear.

What we did not do: convert currencies (Nightwatch is quoted in euros as printed), estimate custom quotes, or score features on a points system. The per-tool sections describe what each price buys and where each tool is the better choice; the "Consider it if" and "Look elsewhere if" lines are the counterweight to the number.

Moistur AI publishes this page and is one of the seven. We placed ourselves where the benchmark puts us, third, and we link to a full one-on-one comparison for every vendor that has one so you can read the case against us in the same voice; the same benchmark ranks the field against Profound on Profound alternatives for agencies.

Alternative 1 of 7

1. Nightwatch — best for sEO agencies that want AI visibility as a column on the rankings report they already send

Ten clients, per month
€159 a month billed yearly (€1,908 a year), or €199 billed monthly
White-label reports
Yes: client-facing reports under your own brand, included from the Professional plan up
Client brands included
25 websites and 150 AI prompts on Professional
Assistants tracked
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews
Source
Nightwatch pricing page, read 2026-10-02

Nightwatch is a rank tracker that added AI visibility, and on the ten-client benchmark it is the lowest figure here. The Professional plan is €159 a month billed yearly (€1,908 a year, a stated saving of €480 against monthly billing, so €199 a month billed monthly) and covers 25 websites, 2,500 keywords and 150 AI prompts tracked daily. The pricing page lists white-label reports from the Professional plan up, described as client-facing reports under your own brand, alongside a Looker Studio integration, unlimited user seats and API access. AI coverage spans ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews. The Agency plan is €399 a month billed yearly for 100 websites and 500 AI prompts. There is a 14-day free trial with no card.

The shape of the allowance is the thing to check. 150 AI prompts across ten clients is 15 each, and AI visibility is one module of a product whose centre of gravity is keyword rankings. That is exactly right for an agency whose clients buy SEO and want to see the AI column next to it, and it is a poor fit for an agency selling AI visibility as the service itself. Prices are in euros and are not converted here.

Consider it if: you already send a Nightwatch or similar rankings report and want AI mentions on the same page under your brand. Look elsewhere if: AI answers are the product, your clients need more than 15 prompts each, or you want sentiment, share of voice and an action plan built for AI answers rather than rankings.

Alternative 2 of 7

2. Otterly AI — best for small agencies starting with one or two clients who can live with a Looker Studio report as the white-label layer

Ten clients, per month
US$489 a month (Premium, 400 prompts) plus Agency Partner status, applied for after subscribing; annual billing 15% off
White-label reports
Partial: branded reports built in Google Looker Studio; no native PDF or share page described
Client brands included
a separate workspace per client for Agency Partners; 500 prompts on Premium
Assistants tracked
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan; Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as paid add-ons
Source
Otterly AI pricing page, read 2026-10-02

Otterly's pricing starts at US$29 a month, which is why it is the first tool many solo marketers try. For an agency the relevant plan is Premium at US$489 a month for 400 search prompts, after which you apply for Agency Partner status after subscribing to Standard or Premium. Partner status raises Premium to 500 prompts, adds a separate workspace per client and pitch workspaces for prospects, and provides branded reports built in Google Looker Studio. Tracking is daily across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot; Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini are paid add-ons. 50+ countries are supported and every plan includes unlimited team members.

Two things to weigh against the price. The white-label output is a Looker Studio report your team builds and maintains rather than a native PDF or share page, and partner status is applied for after subscribing rather than bought off the page, so plan a week for it. Extra prompts are US$99 per 100. Otterly also publishes original research, including a 90-day server-log study of AI crawler visits to an llms.txt file, which is worth reading whichever tool you pick.

Consider it if: you want the lowest US-dollar entry into agency work and are comfortable owning a Looker Studio template. Look elsewhere if: you need white-label PDFs and client logins on day one, or Gemini and Claude without add-on fees. Moistur AI vs Otterly AI covers the two side by side.

Full one-on-one comparison: Moistur AI vs Otterly AI.

Alternative 3 of 7

3. Moistur AI — best for agencies running 5 to 50 client brands that want white-label PDFs, client logins, six assistants and statistically honest scores on one flat plan

Ten clients, per month
US$499 a month flat (Agency), billed monthly; 20% less billed annually
White-label reports
Yes: Your logo, colours and company details on playbook PDFs, report share links and scheduled emails, with the attribution line removable; client logins show the client's read-only dashboard on moistur.ai
Client brands included
Up to 10 client brands, 125 prompts a day pooled
Assistants tracked
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot; Grok and Google AI Mode on Enterprise
Source
Moistur AI pricing page, read 2026-09-23

Moistur AI publishes this page, so read this entry with that in mind and check the others' comparison pages for the case against us. The Agency plan is US$499 a month flat for up to 10 client brands, with white-label included: your logo, colours and company details on playbook PDFs, report share links and scheduled emails, and the attribution line removable. Every client gets a read-only login to their own workspace, you run the roster from one portfolio dashboard, and the plan tracks six assistants with 125 prompts a day pooled across clients. Brand plans start at US$69 a month. Larger rosters are scoped as Agency Enterprise on the setup call.

Two things are different in the measurement. Scores are sampled repeatedly and reported with confidence intervals, because a single AI answer is close to noise; and cross-model disagreement, how far the assistants differ about the same brand and why, is treated as a first-class signal rather than averaged away. Every week the platform produces a prioritised playbook of actions and re-measures each one after you ship it, so a client report shows what the work changed, not only what the number is.

Consider it if: you want the white-label layer, client logins and a weekly action plan included at a flat price, and you would rather have honest error bars than a single confident number. Look elsewhere if: you need enterprise-scale seats and procurement today, a self-serve trial without a call (Moistur AI runs a short call, then a 14-day Pro-level trial), or a BI connector. How Moistur AI compares with every tool on this page and what the company is are one click away.

Alternative 4 of 7

4. Semrush — best for agencies already running on Semrush that want AI mentions in the dashboards they know

Ten clients, per month
US$499 a month: Pro+ at US$299 plus a white-label Pro report at US$20 per client, each per report, billed monthly
White-label reports
Partial: A white-label Pro report from My Reports at US$20 per report, billed monthly; the Agency Growth Kit's client portal is discontinued
Client brands included
15 websites and 100 prompts tracked daily on Pro+
Assistants tracked
Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini; Claude, DeepSeek and Grok via Enterprise AIO
Source
Semrush pricing page, read 2026-10-02

If your team already lives in Semrush, its AI Visibility Toolkit folds AI mentions into the workflows you know, and the ten-client figure is plain arithmetic on two public prices. Pro+ is US$299 a month for 15 websites and 100 prompts tracked daily; a white-label Pro report from My Reports is US$20 per report, billed monthly; ten of them bring the total to US$499. The toolkit is also sold on its own from US$99 a month per domain, billed annually. Brand Performance reports refresh weekly.

The trade-offs are cadence and shape: weekly rather than daily refresh, one shared allowance of 100 prompts a day across the whole account, and a white-label story that now means a per-report add-on because the Agency Growth Kit with its client portal has been discontinued. The SEO data underneath is deep, and one login and one bill are worth something to a busy agency.

Consider it if: Semrush is already your system of record and AI visibility is a report tab, not a service line. Look elsewhere if: you need daily tracking, more prompts per client, or a specialist tool whose whole focus is AI answers. Moistur AI vs Semrush has the full table.

Full one-on-one comparison: Moistur AI vs Semrush.

Alternative 5 of 7

5. Profound — best for enterprise brands, and the agencies that serve them, with a dedicated AEO team and a budget line of its own

Ten clients, per month
About US$4,089 a month at list: US$99 a month plus US$399 a month per client workspace, from the self-serve Agency Growth plan referenced in its pricing FAQ
White-label reports
Not described: White-label output is not mentioned on the pricing page
Client brands included
100 prompts per full client workspace; 10 pitch workspaces a month
Assistants tracked
ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews per client workspace; up to 9 engines on Enterprise
Source
Profound pricing page, read 2026-10-02

Profound is the best-funded platform in the category: a US$180M Series D at a US$1.8B valuation, co-led by Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins, in September 2026, and more than 1,000 enterprise brands. On 2026-10-02 its pricing page showed a free Trial plan (50 prompts a day for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews) and Enterprise, priced on request. The self-serve Agency Growth plan survives in the pricing FAQ rather than as a displayed plan, at US$99 a month plus US$399 a month per client workspace; each full client workspace tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews with 100 prompts, with 10 pitch workspaces a month. Seats are not metered: unlimited seats on both plans.

The arithmetic is per client: ten clients at list is about US$4,089 a month and twenty-five about US$10,074, and white-label reporting is not described on the pricing page. What the price buys at the enterprise tier is depth nothing else on this page matches: up to 9 answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Anthropic Claude, Google AI Overviews and Exa Search), prompt volumes that size demand, region-based prompting, crawler analytics, and a partner directory of 19 vetted agencies on 2026-10-02.

Consider it if: you serve enterprise brands with a dedicated AEO team and a budget line of its own, and a per-workspace bill fits inside the retainers you run. Look elsewhere if: the AI-visibility line item has to fit inside a monthly retainer, or you need white-label reports as a plan feature. Moistur AI vs Profound compares the two, and Profound alternatives for agencies ranks the field from the other direction.

Full one-on-one comparison: Moistur AI vs Profound.

Alternative 6 of 7

6. Goodie AI — best for agencies running a full AEO programme per client, priced per workspace, with strategist support

Ten clients, per month
US$4,265 a month at the annual-billing rates Goodie displays: Agency Growth at US$275 plus a client workspace at US$399 per client, billed quarterly or annually
White-label reports
Not described: White-label output is not mentioned on the pricing page; MCP, API and data export are listed for custom client reporting on Enterprise
Client brands included
full client workspaces as an add-on; 10 pitch workspaces a month on Agency Growth
Assistants tracked
5 core models on Core and 8 on Pro per the brand plans; up to 13 engines on agency Enterprise
Source
Goodie AI pricing page, read 2026-10-02

Goodie positions itself as an end-to-end AEO platform, built for the discipline rather than bolted onto an SEO suite, and its agency pricing follows the same base-plus-workspace model as Profound. Agency Growth, for agencies scaling their AEO practice, is US$275 a month; a won client is added as a full client workspace billed on one of Goodie's three brand plans, of which Core at US$399 is the lowest and Pro is US$999. Ten clients is therefore US$4,265 a month. The figures on the page are annual billing with two months free, and the agency card notes the monthly cost shown is billed quarterly or annually. Agency Growth includes 10 pitch workspaces a month, MCP access and unlimited seats, and brand plans offer a 7-day free trial.

The model makes sense when each client genuinely runs the closed-loop programme a brand would buy directly, with research, content and measurement in one place and a strategist attached. It does not make sense as a reporting layer across a roster of small retainers, where the per-workspace fee is larger than many clients' whole AI-visibility budget. White-label output is not described on the pricing page.

Consider it if: your agency sells full AEO programmes with retainers that can carry a per-client platform fee. Look elsewhere if: you need a flat or pooled price, or white-label reports included as a plan feature.

Alternative 7 of 7

7. Scrunch AI — best for agencies on a Sitecore contract that want AI visibility next to content and agent-experience work

Ten clients, per month
Not published for ten clients: Core is US$250 a month for 1 brand workspace; multi-client work is Enterprise, priced on request
White-label reports
Partial: white-label outputs through its API, on Enterprise
Client brands included
a custom number of brand workspaces on Enterprise; Core has 1
Assistants tracked
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot on Core; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Copilot and Grok on Enterprise
Source
Scrunch AI pricing page, read 2026-10-02

Scrunch, acquired by Sitecore, announced 3 June 2026, sells two plans. Core is US$250 a month for 1 brand workspace, 125 unique prompts, 5 user licences, 5 competitors and 4 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot), with sentiment analysis on both plans, citations and sources on both plans and 5 site audits a month, and a 7-day free trial. Everything an agency needs for ten clients, meaning a custom number of brand workspaces on Enterprise, Looker Studio access on Enterprise only, API access on Enterprise only and white-label outputs through its API, is on Enterprise, which is priced on request. There is no ten-client figure to rank, so Scrunch sits in the "not published" group.

The agencies page describes managing every client and brand from a single workspace, demo environments for prospects and a referral commission of up to 20%, which suggests a real agency motion behind the custom quote, and its Agent Experience Platform (AXP), which serves AI agents an optimised version of your site is a genuinely different capability from anything else on this page.

Consider it if: you already run Sitecore, or you want AI visibility bundled with content and agent-experience tooling and are happy to negotiate. Look elsewhere if: you want a published multi-client price you can put in a proposal this week. Moistur AI vs Scrunch compares the two in detail.

Full one-on-one comparison: Moistur AI vs Scrunch AI.

The other side

Who should stay with Peec AI

Your clients are in Europe, you want prompts in any language and daily tracking across 80+ countries, and you value a vendor whose agency tiers are the clearest in the category. Its free pitch projects let you audit a prospect before they sign, and a view-only shareable dashboard plus client user seats cover the client-facing side without a PDF.

You need demand sizing on each prompt: Peec attaches a 1–5 relative prompt-volume score to every tracked question and pairs it with visibility-lift analysis. Among the seven alternatives, only Profound describes demand sizing of its own, at about US$4,089 a month for ten clients.

Your plan's prompt pool fits your roster. If each client needs fewer than 28 tracked prompts and Claude is not on the list, Growth at US$495 does the job at the same price band as the alternatives, and switching buys you a migration and little else.

Choosing

How to choose

Start with the roster, not the logo. Count the client brands you will report on in twelve months, divide each plan's pooled prompt allowance by that number, and discard any plan that gives a client fewer prompts than the questions its buyers ask. That single division reorders most shortlists.

Decide what "white-label" has to mean for you. A native PDF and share link you can send on Friday afternoon is a different product from a Looker Studio template your team maintains, which is different again from an API you build a report on. The at-a-glance table names the form for every tool.

Ask how the score is made. A number from one run a week is mostly noise; ask each vendor how many times a prompt is sampled, whether the score carries a confidence interval, and whether recommended actions are re-measured after you act. The answers separate a dashboard from a measurement.

Check the assistants your clients' buyers use, not the longest list. Gemini and Google AI Overviews matter for anyone whose buyers start in Google, Copilot for buyers inside Microsoft 365, Perplexity for research-heavy purchases; a plan that adds them as paid add-ons costs more than its headline.

Then price it honestly on the vendor's own page, on the day you buy, and keep the screenshot. Every figure on this page was read on the date shown and is re-checked weekly, but a proposal should carry the price you were quoted, not ours. See Moistur AI pricing for ours.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which Peec AI alternative includes white-label reports at the lowest published price?+

Nightwatch, at €159 a month billed yearly for 25 websites, includes client-facing reports under your own brand from its Professional plan; it is a rank tracker first, with 150 AI prompts on that plan. Among tools built for AI answers, Otterly AI's Premium at US$489 provides branded reports built in Google Looker Studio once Agency Partner status is granted, and Moistur AI's Agency plan at US$499 flat for up to 10 client brands includes native white-label PDFs, share links and emails plus read-only client logins.

How much does Peec AI cost for an agency with ten clients?+

US$495 a month on the Agency Growth tier as read on 2026-10-02: 10 client projects, 25,000 credits (about 277 tracked prompts pooled across them), free pitch projects for prospects, daily tracking and white-label reporting. Essential is US$245 for 3 client projects and Scale is US$795 for 25; Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen and Mistral are paid add-on models on top.

Is there a free Peec AI alternative?+

Not for ongoing agency reporting. Peec itself offers a self-serve free trial, Profound offers a free Trial plan for 7 days, Otterly's pricing starts at US$29 a month for a single small plan, Scrunch and Goodie offer 7-day trials, Nightwatch offers a 14-day free trial with no card, and Moistur AI runs a 14-day Pro-level trial after a short call. For a one-off check, a free AI visibility audit shows whether the assistants recommend a brand today without a subscription.

Do these tools track the same AI assistants as Peec AI?+

Not all of them, and not on every plan. Peec's brand plans include 3 engines chosen from six core assistants, with Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen and Mistral as paid add-ons on higher tiers. Otterly tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan with Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as add-ons; Moistur AI's Agency plan covers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot; Semrush covers Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini; Profound's enterprise tier lists up to 9 engines; Scrunch Core covers 4 engines and Enterprise 9. Check the plan you would actually buy, not the logo wall.

Why do Peec AI's public pages disagree about what each agency tier includes?+

We do not know, and we say so rather than pick one. On 2026-10-02 the for-agencies page said every tier includes Looker Studio, the API and MCP; the AI-instructions page said Looker Studio from Growth up and the API and MCP on Comprehensive only; the agency pricing grid listed the Looker Studio connector on Scale and Comprehensive, with the API, MCP and CSV exports on every agency tier. Each quote is stored verbatim and re-checked weekly; when Peec reconciles its pages, this answer changes.

How were the prices on this page checked, and how often are they re-checked?+

Every figure was first read from the vendor's own pricing page between 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-23, re-confirmed against the live pages on 2026-10-02, the date shown in its row and section, and stored with the vendor's exact words as proof. A script re-fetches every page weekly and flags any quote that has disappeared, and the entry is reviewed and the "Last updated" date changed when a price moves. Nothing here is estimated, converted between currencies, or taken from a third-party review.

Does Moistur AI have a comparison page for each of these tools?+

For Peec AI itself, Otterly AI, Profound, Semrush, Scrunch, Ahrefs and the rest of the six, yes, each written in the same voice and saying when the other tool is the better choice: Moistur AI vs Profound, vs Peec AI, vs Otterly AI, vs Semrush, vs Scrunch and vs Ahrefs. Nightwatch and Goodie appear in the best AI visibility tools roundup, which is ranked on the same ten-client benchmark as this page.

Provenance

Sources and pricing checked 2026-10-02

Every quoted figure is stored with the vendor’s exact wording and re-fetched weekly; an entry is reviewed the week its quote disappears.

Next step

Start with your own numbers

A ranked list cannot tell you whether AI recommends your clients today. A free audit can, and a 15-minute call shows the agency plan on a real roster.

Run a free audit